Over the past 10 years, the San Diego Unified School Districts energy efficiency program has reduced energy usage by 25%.
The San Diego Unified School
District (SDUSD) lays claim to having one of the lowest utility costs per
student in the country. It first initiated an energy efficiency program in 1994,
and to date, the district has saved nearly $131.8 million in avoided energy
costs. Today, its 220 educational facilities make up the second largest school
district in California with over 132,000 students.
The policy of the district’s Board
of Education now is to build all of its new buildings on a net-zero energy use
basis. Building schools “green” with a low-carbon footprint and air conditioning
is a real challenge. But the school district has a track record of success.
Over the past 10 years, SDUSD has
reduced energy usage by 25% through installation of solar photovoltaic systems,
efficient lighting, occupancy sensors, cool curtains, a dark campus policy, and
an energy management control system (EMCS) to centrally monitor and control HVAC
systems. A separate irrigation management control system was designed and
installed to centrally control irrigation at 163 schools through 24-hour
monitoring.
Since 2003, the district has
installed integrated rooftop photovoltaic arrays at 28 district sites and has
plans for more installations. It continues to evaluate innovative ideas. The
district’s energy management staff has gone on to establish environmental clubs
at schools, and they work with teachers to integrate energy awareness into the
curriculum.
As a result, the SDUSD has won
half a dozen awards recognizing its achievements in energy efficiency and
resource conservation. Since 1998, it has participated in the EPA’s Energy Star
Label for Buildings Program, and in 2007 received the Energy Star Partner of the
Year award. Over 150 buildings in the district have received plaques as Energy
Star Label Buildings.
The district’s first work began in
1994, after it sold $42 million in bonds, according to J. William Naish,
Energy/Utility Management Supervisor. Its Energy Efficiency Program included
replacing old fluorescent lighting fixtures and exchanging 400,000 T-12 lamps
with T-8s in 150 schools and installing 7,500 occupancy sensors. It also
replaced 1,000 toilets with low-flush models with pressurized bladders. The
projects paid for themselves in 18 months.
The energy savings leveraged
bigger projects in the next phase of SDUSD’s energy efficiency program. A
consultant was hired “and big things happened then,” says Naish. The projects
included upgrading rooftop air conditioning units and tying them into a new
EMCS. At the same time, the district created a permanent energy/utility
management section, and in 1997, Naish was hired to run it.
By 2000, the major retrofit
projects were completed and the bonds were paid off in eight years instead of
12. That year, the school district partnered with San Diego Gas & Electric
(SDG&E), and its engineers identified additional projects. The utility
provided incentives to help pay for retrofits as well. At a cost of $1 million,
gym lighting was upgraded and occupancy sensors were installed in all teachers’
lounges. Occupancy sensors with both infrared and air movement sensors were
chosen to avoid teachers being stranded in a darkened room if there was no air
movement. With this dual technology, both infrared and air movement sensors need
to detect an empty room to turn lights off, but only one type is needed to turn
the lights on.
Solar PV Is Introduced
Once the initial large projects
were up-and-running in 2000, Naish’s office initiated its pilot solar
photovoltaic program and installed arrays at five elementary schools. Southern
California Edison provided the funding through the California Public Utilities
Commission rebate program. One array of 36 to 48 modules of PV paneling was
mounted on the roof of a portable classroom at each school. An “Envirometer” was
also installed to display current energy production and pollution savings.
 |
Photo: San Diego City Schools Bob Martin, planned projects program coordinator for San Diego Unified School District, shows students and teachers from Birney Elementary School a
component of the solar roofing system atop the district’s Education Center. |
The solar program was expanded in
2003 and began with a solicitation for proposals from private companies. Naish
says the district was the first in the nation to seek a power purchase agreement
and third party financing. Between 2003 and 2007, solar systems totaling 4 MW
were integrated into new roofs on 28 schools. The district chose roof-integrated
thin film technology, because of the concern over vandals breaking glass
paneling. Integrating the system into the roof also saved future roofing
costs.
Solar Integrated Technologies was
selected to install and maintain the systems at 24 schools with funding provided
by GE Energy Financial Services. UPC Solar funded installation at four
additional schools and will provide funding for up to an additional 12 PV
systems. The California Energy Commission provided incentives.
Naish says the district is paying
a discount to SIT and UPC Solar of either 2.5% or 2.0% off the blended utility
rate. Currently, it is 18 cents per kilowatt-hour for 20 years, for the
electricity generated by the 28 systems.
“We can budget and predict utility
rates” for this electricity, he says. “The risk that we took was that
electricity will not go down,” says Naish. “The beauty where we sit ... If they
don’t produce, we don’t pay.”
Naish says before the systems were
installed, electricity use by the schools was costing the district $50,000 a
year. Now Naish is predicting the systems will save $250,000 annually.
The biggest challenge with the PV
systems, says Naish, came in 2007, when SDG&E doubled its demand charges for
off-peak electrical usage over its on-peak demand charges. “This made solar so
bad, it cost money to run the systems,” he says. The City of San Diego
intervened in SDG&E’s rate case and in July 2008, the CPUC approved
eliminating demand charges for solar installations.
Naish says the district is eager
to install another 4 MW of solar PV and already another 19 sites have been
identified. But the district is finding it difficult due to problems with
financing, given the current economic climate.
The district is looking for
partners for additional distributed generation projects, such as microturbines
and urban wind systems, and has an active rolling request for proposals. Naish
says he received a lot of interest, and is now looking at all options that came
through.
“I’d love to get solar and wind at
every school,” he says. “It’s very teachable. My goals are always driven by
cost. We have to spend the tax payers’ money right ... and we have the
responsibility to teach students right.”
To Cool or Not to Cool?
When schools were built near the
coast in San Diego, there was no need for air conditioning, but as the district
expanded eastward into hotter territory heating, ventilating, and air
conditioning became necessary. The EMCS installed in the late 1990s reduced
costs in the 50 schools that had air conditioning and were the biggest users of
electricity. The addition of solar systems on these buildings has cut costs even
further.
 |
Photo: San Diego City Schools Aerial view of Jackson Elementary School, in San Diego, CA |
At the time the EMCS was
installed, an energy manager was hired to operate it. Now 165 schools are
connected to the EMCS through the district’s wide area network. The
computer-based system controls and monitors air conditioning, heating, and
ventilation systems; gym lighting; and walk-in refrigerator/freezer alarms.
Naish estimates the system is saving the district $1.5 million annually in
electricity and natural gas costs.
The EMCS provides a real-time view
of the HVAC systems in each school, including temperature, occupancy, and
lighting conditions for most rooms. Through its troubleshooting capabilities,
the EMCS can identify problems before the site is affected and generate an alarm
indicating a malfunction. The energy manager can diagnose and correct the
problem from the EMS keyboard before it is even noticed at the school.
Naish says the department now has
two full-time EMCS operators. They work with the mechanics in the field to make
sure unoccupied schoolrooms are not being air conditioned, for example. It is
difficult to shed loads now, because the set point for air conditioning is 78
degrees, although there is some flux with equipment, up from 75.5 degrees where
temperatures had been kept for some years. Classrooms never get hotter than 78,
Naish says. When he arrived in 1997, set points were kept at 68 degrees with no
oversight.
Heating and cooling is programmed
to function only during school hours, or office hours. Override buttons can be
used to turn units on in specific rooms if it is being used after hours.
Scheduling can generate 80% of the $1.5 million that the district estimates the
EMCS saves annually in energy costs. The remaining savings are derived through
control of airflow to rooms, the amount of outside air delivered, and
temperature adjustment based on outdoor conditions. “We’ve been managing the
cooling loads long that enough teachers no longer complain,” says Naish.
When he started the job in 1997,
he worked with the district board and a dedicated staff to develop principles.
There were many sick building complaints but the staff addressed them right away
and was able to change the nature of the issues. Naish describes it as “growing
and learning.” Right now, everyone is cooperating, he says.
In 1999, the district hired
Healthy Buildings International Inc. to review indoor air quality (IAQ) as part
of its energy retrofit program. It developed and updated IAQ information for use
in existing air-conditioning, building construction, and operation, and wrote
guidelines for use of thermal displacement ventilation in new air-conditioned
projects. Since then, it has monitored IAQ programs in 40 air-conditioned
schools.
As of 2008, the district’s Board
of Education set a policy that school sites will not be air-conditioned unless
they meet certain exceptions: The buildings have no operable windows, and if
noise problems, require windows to be kept closed (like being under the airport
flight path).
The board will allow school-funded
air conditioning as long as overall utility consumption is reduced and the site
pays all upfront costs, plus ongoing costs, including utility charges, regularly
scheduled maintenance, repair and replacement costs, and custodial time, to
ensure regular and proper cleaning of interior surfaces. Most school sites have
found these requirements cost-prohibitive.
What’s Left to Do?
Naish’s view is that there is
always more to do. For example, his staff studied adding insulation to the walls
and in ceilings of buildings. Under certain circumstances, they found it would
increase costs. By making buildings tighter, heat starts permeating structures
later in the afternoon, and the latent heating load would shift to later in the
evening. Buildings would still be warm in the morning, increasing air
conditioning work.
Tons of windows are not yet
dual-glazed, says Naish. He is hoping there might be dollars coming from the
federal stimulus package to replace those windows.
The district continues to look for
ways to cool schoolrooms with zero gain—in other words, to not add to existing
energy costs. Naish and his staff are looking at displacement ventilation that
uses 20% to 30% less energy. The system would be appropriate for rooms with very
high ceilings well over 9 feet, such as auditoriums and multipurpose rooms. It
is used widely in Europe—in particular, the Scandinavian countries—since the
1970s, where it is now considered to be a proven technology.
Low-volume air is interjected at
floor level from specialized package rooftop air-conditioning systems with
digital scroll compressors. Cool air coming in at the floor level replaces
rising warm air with the bodies in the room acting as chimneys. The air is then
exhausted at ceiling level.
Naish says this system has been
successfully installed in casinos where the chimney effect removes the smoke. He
predicted electrical bills would be decreased 60% to 80%. For more information,
visit www.xetexinc.com or other sites on
the Internet.
The district has also checked out
the Solatube Daylighting System. A rooftop optical dome redirects low-angle
sunlight through a tube built into the roof ending at the ceiling where the
daylight is diffused into the room. The appearance on the ceiling is that of a
fixture set into the ceiling. More
information is available at Solatube’s Web site, www.solatube.com.
The Solatube reduces lighting
costs by 85%, “but they are expensive, and we’re so efficient now,” says Naish.
Lighting levels in rooms are at 50-foot candles, down from 120, so there is much
less tradeoff, he explains.
While the staff has studied
thermal energy storage, there is not too much interest in it. What they are
going ahead with, at least with an initial installation, is the variable
refrigerant volume (VRV) system that would cut air conditioning costs by
30%.
Evan Leslie, project management
supervisor in the Facilities Management Unit at SDUSD, explains it this way: The
VRV system uses one outdoor condenser that supplies refrigerant to five or more
classrooms, each with an indoor fan coil unit and a thermostat. The VRV system
decides how much load is required for each room and allows several spaces served
by the same condensing unit to be in either heating or cooling mode at the same
time. The package units can be moved to where the load is, explains Leslie. He
notes they are too heavy for schoolroom roofs.
The condensers use inverter-driven
compressor technology to supply refrigerant to a routing box that communicates
with the fan coils to supply the refrigerant via electronic expansion valves for
both heating and cooling modes. If the system is calling for both heating and
cooling in separate rooms, the heat produced in the cooling zones is recovered
and used to heat the refrigerant for the zones calling for cooling. The heat
generated from cooling is used to warm the air in the spaces calling for
heating.
Leslie explains that energy
savings have ranged from 15% to 35% when compared to packaged rooftop units and
central plants. They exceed California Energy Commission Title 24 energy
standards by 15% to 20%. The noise from the indoor fan coil units average about
35 db(A), while a typical conversation creates around 60 db(A), he says. VRV
systems can be integrated into EMCS controls and require less maintenance than
packaged rooftop units and central plants. They’ve been installed in schools,
hospitals, office buildings, and banks for over 20 years across Asia, Europe,
and South America, he says.
He says the first VRV installation
will be at the Ellen Browning Scripps Elementary School, now being designed.
Construction is expected to start during the fourth quarter this year. The VRV
system will be installed by mid-2010. He says a VRV system costs $30 to $40 per
square foot, while displacement ventilation will cost between $60 and $80 per
square foot. He says Solatubes cost about $3 per square foot.
Educational Mission
Mindful
of the district’s educational mission,
Naish says energy is being incorporated into the curriculum. “It’s unfortunate
that schools do green things and kids don’t know it. We’re trying to bridge
that.”
Naish’s office created a solar
activity kit with extra solar panels that part-time teachers are using to teach
students the rudiments of solar installations. “A teacher in the School of
Science and Technology at San Diego High has his class make biodiesel in
chemical labs from grease generated in our cafeterias,” he explains.
The biodiesel is being burned in
30 school buses, and they would like more to run all 100-plus buses.
Furthermore, the school district avoids paying to have the grease disposed of,
so it’s saving more money. One of the staff people in the asphalt shop, where
diesel fuel was being used to clean tools, picked up on the idea and introduced
biodiesel to clean the tools instead. It has eliminated issues raised by the EPA
and Cal OSHA over the use of diesel fuel in the work area.
Building Green
Lee Dulgeroff is director of
project management for Prop S, the $2-billion proposition approved by San Diego
voters in November 2008 to upgrade schools in the district. Prop MM was approved
five years ago, raising $1 billion that has already been spent. Dulgeroff
manages all capital projects. There are now 200 in various stages of design and
construction.
Dulgeroff explains that the
district’s Board of Education, in 2003, adopted the construction and demolition
standards created for schools, called Collaborative for High Performance
Schools, and they now incorporate the latest green building standards. All
retrofits and new construction adhere to these standards. “We are using
sustainable design, materials and products,” he says.
And life cycle costs are
emphasized in design. Two new schools are under construction, and another eight
buildings are being designed. Three are two-story, well-insulated buildings
replacing portable classrooms. Dulgeroff says every project will be looking at
incorporating solar photovoltaic systems into its design. When third parties are
involved in constructing a project, such as a solar installation, Dulgeroff’s
office facilitates the work.
The eight buildings in design are
intended for career technical education. The Sustainable Technologies Program
Building at Scripps Ranch High School will prepare students in environmental
technology careers—green collar jobs, says Dulgeroff. The Green Construction
Building being designed at Hoover High School will teach students sustainable
construction, including reuse of materials.
Most of the retrofitting involves
modernizing about 180 schools. New dual pane windows with low E values, new
cabinetry and doors and LED lighting are being installed. The designs maximize
daylighting. Dulgeroff says Naish’s Energy/Utility Management unit checks out
each project looking for ways to reduce energy. Once they identify something,
Dulgeroff’s group does the work.
VRV systems, described by Leslie
above, will be integrated into the construction of all major retrofits, as well
as new buildings if air conditioning is needed, Dulgeroff says.
It
is hard to identify the energy cost-savings with retrofits, Dulgeroff says,
because retrofitting is not an exact science. “Cost savings are important, but
it’s the right thing to do for the environment and to improve the world those
students live in.”